Kennedy v. County of Lancaster, et al
| Mark Kennedy |
| County of Lancaster and John Does 1-5 |
| 4:2012cv03247 |
| December 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER - The parties' Rule 60(a) motion is granted. A separate nunc pro tunc judgment will be entered. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting 90 Stipulation for Dismissal. The plaintiff's claims against the County of Lancaster are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs. Claims against the Lincoln and Lancaster County Child Guidance Center, Inc., are unaffected by this order. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying as moot the County's pending 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court has been advised that the plaintiff and the County of Lancaster have settled their claims. On or before July 24, 2014, the plaintiff and County shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal, or other dispositive stipulation, together with submitting to the undersigned judge a draft order which will fully dispose of the plaintiff's claims again the County. Absent compliance with this order, the plantiff's claims against the County may be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by District Judge John M. Gerrard. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting 73 Motion for Leave to depose a confined person. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER - The motion to withdraw filed by Michael E. Thew as counsel of record on behalf of Defendant County of Lancaster, (filing no. 52 ), is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER - Defendants' expert disclosure deadline is extended to April 8, 2014, with any rebuttal expert disclosure due on or before April 22, 2014. The deposition deadline is extended to May 13, 2014. The deadline for filing motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment and motions or to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds remains May 27, 2014. The pretrial conference and trial dates are unchanged. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Motion to Continue. Jury Trial set for 9/15/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Robert V. Denney Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Judge John M. Gerrard. Pretrial Conference set for 8/26/2014 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Status Conference set for 5/20/2014 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Motion to Continue Deadlines. Jury Trial set for 7/15/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Robert V. Denney Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Judge John M. Gerrard. Pretrial Conference set for 7/1/2014 at 10:00 AM by WebEx before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. An email will be sent to counsel of record with the instructions and codes for participating in the pretrial conference by WebEx. Telephone Conference set for 4/1/2014 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Counsel for plaintiff shall place the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (DMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
