Perry v. Lancaster County Nebraska
Precious Perry |
Lancaster County Nebraska |
4:2013cv03013 |
January 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Richard G. Kopf |
Cheryl R. Zwart |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendant's motion for summary judgment (Filing 17 ) is granted on all of the plaintiff's claims. Judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff shall be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG) |
Filing 31 ORDER - The motion to withdraw filed by Michael E. Thew as counsel of record on behalf of Defendant County of Lancaster, (filing no. 30 ), is granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB) |
Filing 27 ORDER - The pretrial conference and trial are continued until further order of the court. The parties shall contact the undersigned magistrate's chambers within ten (10) days after the ruling on the summary judgment to discuss the future progression of the case, if needed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (GJG) |
Filing 26 ORDER - Defendant's Motion to Substitute Evidentiary Materials Filed in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 23 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall: (a) strike and seal what is now Filings 18-10, 18-11, and 18-1 2; (b) file Filing 23-3 as Filing 18-58; (c) file Filing 18-11 as Filing 18-59; and (d) file Filing 18-12 as Filing 18-60. Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Extend Plaintiff's Brief Date in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summar y Judgment (Filing 25 ) is granted, and Plaintiff's brief shall be filed on or before December 30, 2013. Defendant may file a reply to Plaintiff's brief on or before January 6, 2014, after which Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 17 ) shall be ripe for disposition. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Zwart to determine whether the pretrial conference and the trial in this matter should be continued. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Continue. --Jury Trial set for 2/18/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, Robert V. Denney Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, NE before Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. --Pretrial Conference set for 2/4/2014 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perry v. Lancaster County Nebraska | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lancaster County Nebraska | |
Represented By: | Michael E. Thew |
Represented By: | Richard C. Grabow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Precious Perry | |
Represented By: | Joy A. Shiffermiller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.