Woolman v. Taco Inn
||Mr. Michael B. Woolman
||February 5, 2013
||Nebraska District Court
||4 Lincoln Office
||Pro Se Docket
||John M. Gerrard
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 6, 2013
ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (copy emailed to pro se party)(ADB)
|March 12, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until April 15, 2013, to amend his Complaint and clearly state a claim upon which relief may be granted against Defendants in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amen ded complaint, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants will be dismissed without further notice. In the event that Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff shall restate the allegations of the current Complaint (filing no. 1 ) and any n ew allegations. Failure to consolidate all claims into one document may result in the abandonment of claims. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Check for amended com plaint on April 15, 2013. Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times while this case is pending. Failure to do so may result in dismissal without further notice. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.