Calderon v. Houston
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 22, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Filing No. 7 ), Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Filing No. 10 ), and Motion for Summons (Filing No. 13 ) are denied. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)
|February 13, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing no. 2 ) is granted. The clerk's office is directed to receipt $25.00 to 4:08CV3089, and then apply the $12.45 overpayment to Plaintiff's initial part ial filing fee in this case. Plaintiff shall pay the remaining balance of his initial partial filing fee, which is $41.35, by March 8, 2013, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. If the initial partial fi ling fee is not received by the specified deadline, this case will be dismissed. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution shall collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. 167; 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and shall forward those installments to the court. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 8, 2013: initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed as directed and to pro se party) (Copy given to Finance)(AOA)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?