Beckett v. Colvin
| Barbara Kay Beckett |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2013cv03057 |
| March 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Commissioner of Social Security's decision is affirmed. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER - The Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Brief, ECF No. 21 , is granted. The defendant shall have on or before October 9, 2013, in which to file and serve her response to the plaintiff&# 039;s brief. Within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief. The case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (filing 2 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall file the original complaint and the accompanying pleadings without the prepayment of costs or fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
