Nelson v. Carson Valley United Methodist Church
| Gregg M. Nelson |
| Does 1-5, Carson Valley United Methodist Church and Roe Companies 1-3 |
| 4:2013cv03113 |
| June 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - CVUMC's Motion to Strike (filing 7 ) is denied. CVUMC's Motion to Dismiss (filing 4 ) is granted in accordance with this Memorandum and Order and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - By October 23, 2013, Defendants are directed to supplement the record with the "Judgement by Default" discussed in Michael Millward's Affidavit. Further, Defendants are directed to file a supplemental brief add ressing the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to this matter. Defendants' failure to supplement the record in accordance with this Memorandum and Order may result in the denial of their Motion to Dismiss. If Defendants file a supplemental brief, Plaintiff may file a response within 14 days of such filing. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
