Clayborne v. Parker et al
| Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr. |
| Messersmith, Lancaster Department of Correction, Kounovsky, James, Chad Hein, CCS Correct Care Solutions, Troy Aksamit, Scott Parker, Lori A. Pasold, Ripley and Sundermeier |
| 4:2013cv03145 |
| August 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting the Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr. shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $16.10 by September 30, 2013, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiffs institution. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 9/30/2013:initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party and to Plaintiff's institution as directed)(MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
