Houck v. Colvin
| Angel D. Houck |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2013cv03216 |
| December 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ's findings. The Commissioner's denial of plaintiff's benefits claim will be affirmed. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion for extension of time is granted; defendant shall have until June 23, 2014, to file a response to plaintiff's brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting the Defendant's 15 Motion for Extension of time; defendant shall have until May 23, 2014, to file a response to plaintiff's brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This action shall be filed at no cost to plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
