Burries v. Houston, et al
||Anthony L. Burries
||Dr. Stairs, Mr. Poezhl, Robert Houston, Mrs. Dodds, Richard Cruickshank and Curtis Wees
||December 19, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||4 Lincoln Office
||Pro Se Docket
||Richard G. Kopf
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 13, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with this court's orders and local rules. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|December 27, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint on or before January 27, 2014. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further noti ce. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the followi ng text: January 27, 2014: deadline forpayment or filing of IFP application. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240,Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 1/27/2014.) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?