Lopez v. Osburn et al
||Ignacio A. Lopez
||Steven Bahe, Cynthia Bahe and Richard D. Osburn
||December 26, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||4 Lincoln Office
||Laurie Smith Camp
||Pro Se Docket
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 5, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|January 9, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Ignacio A. Lopez shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $37.16 by 2/10/2017, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written moti on. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Fe bruary 10, 2014: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times, and all parties are bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and by the court's Local Rules while this case is pending. Plaintiff shall review the "Notice Regarding Summons Forms" attached to this Order.Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed.)(GJG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?