Prokupek et al v. Bruning et al
| Christine Prokupek and Ronald Prokupek |
| Eric Holder and Jon Bruning |
| 4:2013cv03225 |
| December 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on the court's on motion. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. A separate Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiffs shall have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file a second amended complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Failure to file a second amended complaint will result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 9/8/2014.) Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER provisionally granting the Joint 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
