Guerry v. Bellevue Police Department Criminal Investigation Bureau of the Law Enforcement Agency et al
|Brian Frank Guerry
|John Stacey, Bellevue Police Department Criminal Investigation Bureau of the Law Enforcement Agency, Derek Bees and Laurie Synowiecki
|April 4, 2014
|US District Court for the District of Nebraska
|4 Lincoln Office
|Pro Se Docket
|Lyle E. Strom
|Nature of Suit:
|Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 29, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION that this action is dismissed without prejudice so that plaintiff will be able to renew the claims that he is attempting to bring here if the conviction at issue is ever vacated in a proper forum. Because the Court will dismiss the claims over which it has original jurisdiction, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|April 15, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Brian Frank Guerry shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $20.27 by 5/12/14, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written moti on. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at plaintiff's institution. The clerk is directed to set a Pro Se Case Management Deadline for 5/12/2014: initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copies mailed to pro se plaintiff and as directed) (JSF)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?