Abram v. Bischoff

Abram v. Bischoff

Plaintiff:	Eddie E. Abram
Defendant:	Bischoff
Case Number:	4:2014cv03120
Filed:	May 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge:	Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 7, 2015	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed with prejudice because the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
March 2, 2015	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: On the court's own motion, Abram shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint that states a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to sufficiently amend his Complaint will resul t in dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 27, 2015: Check for amended complaint. Pending amendment of the Complaint, the court makes no finding with respect to its supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims raised in the Complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 7, 2015

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed with prejudice because the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)

March 2, 2015

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: On the court's own motion, Abram shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint that states a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to sufficiently amend his Complaint will resul t in dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 27, 2015: Check for amended complaint. Pending amendment of the Complaint, the court makes no finding with respect to its supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims raised in the Complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abram v. Bischoff
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eddie E. Abram
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bischoff
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?