Garver v. State of Nebraska et al
Petitioner: Michael D. Garver
Respondent: District Court Stanton County, Nebraska and State of Nebraska
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 4:2015cv03017
Filed: February 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Petitioner failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
August 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The petitioner must apprise the court of his current address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 7, 2015: check for address; dismiss if no update. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
April 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: On the court's own motion, Petitioner has 30 days to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus naming the current warden of Petitioner's place of confinement as the respondent. In the alternative, Petitio ner may file a motion to substitute party in which he asks the court to substitute the current warden at his present place of confinement as the respondent. Failure to comply as directed may result in dismissal of this matter without further notice to Petitioner. The clerk of the court is directed to set the following pro se case management deadline: May 22, 2015: Deadline for the petitioner to name proper respondent. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garver v. State of Nebraska et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: District Court Stanton County, Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Nebraska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael D. Garver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Douglas J. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?