Nedrow v. City of Waverly
||Larry E. Nedrow
||City of Waverly
||March 14, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||4 Lincoln Office
||John M. Gerrard
||Cheryl R. Zwart
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 6, 2017
ORDER that the motion to withdraw filed by Ross R. Pesek, Adam E. Emerton, and the Pesek Law firm, as counsel of record for Plaintiff (Filing No. 18 ), is granted. On or before January 27, 2017, Plaintiff Larry E. Nedrow shall either: (a) obtain t he services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance in this case; or (b) file a statement notifying the court of his intent to litigate this case without the assistance of counsel. The failure to do so may result in a dismissal of Pla intiff's claims without further notice. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his last known address: 10331 N 145th Street, Waverly, NE 68462. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|July 27, 2016
ORDER -The Rule 26(f) Report deadline is stayed pending further order of the court. A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held on January 3, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. to discuss the status of case progression and potential settlement. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case, (see Filing No. 14 ), to participate in the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?