Steier v. Lochland County Club et al
| Philip Steier |
| Highland Operating Co., John Jane Doe I II, John Jane Doe III IV, John Jane Doe V VI, Lochland County Club, PAI Management L.L.C., Profit Advantage, Inc. and Scott Shardelow |
| 4:2016cv03184 |
| December 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT that this action, including all claims, counterclaims, and crossclaims, is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LAC)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant PAI Management, L.L.C.'s motion to dismiss (Filing No. 8 ) is granted, and all claims alleged said Defendant will be dismissed with prejudice, without further notice or further order, unless Plaintiff files a se cond amended complaint against said Defendant within 21 days of today's date. Defendant Profit Advantage, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (Filing No. 12 ) is granted, and all claims alleged said Defendant will be dismissed with prejudice, without further notice or further order, unless Plaintiff files a second amended complaint against said Defendant within 21 days of today's date. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (CS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
