Rodriguez v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
| Jose E. Rodriguez |
| Wayne Chandler, Scott R. Frakes, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Michael Rothwell and Diana Sabatka-Rine |
| 4:2017cv03004 |
| January 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's claims for monetary relief against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice as barred by the Eleventh Amendment. Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court will enter judgment by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $$44.11 within 30 days, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 2/23/2017. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and institution) (CS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
