Behrends v. BNSF Railway Company

Behrends v. BNSF Railway Company

Plaintiff:	Melissa L. Behrends
Defendant:	BNSF Railway Company
Case Number:	4:2017cv03008
Filed:	January 20, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge:	Susan M. Bazis
Presiding Judge:	John M. Gerrard
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 13, 2018	Filing 60 ORDER that the Defendant shall supply the cell phone records of Richard Duncan from February, 2014 through July, 2015. Defendant shall supply the cell phone records of Mike Harvey from January, 2015 to the date of Plaintiff's termination. The scope of the production shall be limited to records of phone calls with Plaintiff and co-workers who shall be specifically identified by their phone numbers by Plaintiff. Defendant shall respond to Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2. Defendant shall respo nd to Interrogatory No. 9 and Request for Production No. 7, but the scope of these discovery requests is limited to the 36-month time period before Plaintiff was terminated and is further narrowed to only include conductors and engineers. The part ies resolved the discovery dispute concerning Interrogatory Nos. 10 and 23. Plaintiff has withdrawn Interrogatory No. 25. Defendant represents that it has supplied a complete response to Request for Production No. 29. Defendant shall supplement its response to this Request as necessary. Defendant may review the issue of the burdensomeness of responding to Plaintiff's discovery requests based on what the Court has ordered today. Should it so desire, and after conferring with Plaintiff& #039;s counsel in an effort to resolve the matter, Defendant may submit evidence regarding the burdensomeness of responding to the discovery requests to bazis@ned.uscourts.gov. The Court would then set another telephone conference to discuss the matter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LAC)
February 8, 2018	Filing 47 PROTECTIVE ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for Protective Order. (Filing No. 46 .) The Stipulation is adopted and approved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 13, 2018

Filing 60 ORDER that the Defendant shall supply the cell phone records of Richard Duncan from February, 2014 through July, 2015. Defendant shall supply the cell phone records of Mike Harvey from January, 2015 to the date of Plaintiff's termination. The scope of the production shall be limited to records of phone calls with Plaintiff and co-workers who shall be specifically identified by their phone numbers by Plaintiff. Defendant shall respond to Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2. Defendant shall respo nd to Interrogatory No. 9 and Request for Production No. 7, but the scope of these discovery requests is limited to the 36-month time period before Plaintiff was terminated and is further narrowed to only include conductors and engineers. The part ies resolved the discovery dispute concerning Interrogatory Nos. 10 and 23. Plaintiff has withdrawn Interrogatory No. 25. Defendant represents that it has supplied a complete response to Request for Production No. 29. Defendant shall supplement its response to this Request as necessary. Defendant may review the issue of the burdensomeness of responding to Plaintiff's discovery requests based on what the Court has ordered today. Should it so desire, and after conferring with Plaintiff& #039;s counsel in an effort to resolve the matter, Defendant may submit evidence regarding the burdensomeness of responding to the discovery requests to bazis@ned.uscourts.gov. The Court would then set another telephone conference to discuss the matter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LAC)

February 8, 2018

Filing 47 PROTECTIVE ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for Protective Order. (Filing No. 46 .) The Stipulation is adopted and approved. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Behrends v. BNSF Railway Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By:	Nichole S. Bogen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa L. Behrends
Represented By:	Justin J. Knight
Represented By:	Corey L. Stull
Represented By:	Jeanette L. Stull
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?