Rentzell v. Berryhill
Susan M. Rentzell |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
4:2017cv03037 |
March 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Susan M. Bazis |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion for Order reversing the Commissioner's decision (Filing No. 17 ) is denied. Defendant's Motion to Affirm the Commissioner's Decision (Filing No. 23 ) is granted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (CS) |
Filing 19 ORDER that Plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time (Filing No. 18]) to file a brief in support of his Motion for Order Reversing the Commissioner's decision (Filing No. 17 ) is granted. Plaintiff's brief in support of h is Motion for Order Reversing the Commissioner's decision (Filing No. 17 ) shall be filed on or before October 2, 2017. The Commissioner shall file a motion for an order affirming the Commissioner's decision, or granting other relief, with supporting brief on or before November 1, 2017. Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before November 15, 2017, after which this matter shall be considered submitted for decision. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LAC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.