Vang v. Berryhill
| Gregory D. Vang |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2017cv03039 |
| March 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Reversing the Commissioner's Decision (Filing No. 15) is denied. Defendant's Motion to Affirm the Commissioner's Decision (Filing No. 19) is granted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff's brief in support of his Motion for Order reversing the Commissioner's decision (Filing No. 15) shall be filed on or before July 27, 2017; The Commissioner shall file a motion for an ord er affirming the Commissioner's decision, or granting other relief, with supporting brief on or before August 28, 2017; and Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before September 11, 2017, after which this matter shall be considered submitted for decision. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
