Fontenot v. McNeil Industrial, Inc.
| Matthew Fontenot |
| McNeil Industrial, Inc. |
| 4:2017cv03113 |
| August 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Susan M. Bazis |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER: On November 28, 2018, a telephone conference was held regarding a dispute over the content of the notice to be sent to members of this conditionally certified collective action. It was agreed during the conference that the Court would review the parties' proposed notices, and then provide the parties with the notice to be used in this action. Having reviewed and considered the matter, the approved notice is set forth below. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - Depositions due 8/8/19. The Final Pretrial Conference with the assigned magistrate judge is set for January 3, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. It will be held via Internet/Teleconferencing. Jury Trial set for January 27, 2020, in Lincoln, Nebraska, before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 47 ) is adopted. Defendant's objection (Filing No. 57 ) to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certifi cation and Notice to Putative Class Members (Filing No. 24 ) is granted. While Defendant does not object to the Magistrate Judge's Findings regarding the Notice and Consent Forms (Filing No. 47 at CM/ECF pp. 5-7), the court hereby clarifies that the Judge's findings in this regard are adopted. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKO)
|
|
Filing
46
PROTECTIVE ORDER - For good cause shown under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), the Court hereby enters the Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that Attorney Richard J. Burch is to register for admittance to practice and register for the System. Show Cause Deadline set for 3/23/2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (Copy mailed to Richard L. Burch) (LKO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fontenot v. McNeil Industrial, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Fontenot | |
| Represented By: | Richard J. Burch |
| Represented By: | Lindsay R. Itkin |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Jorde |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Josephson |
| Represented By: | Christian T. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: McNeil Industrial, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
