Cruz v. State of Nebraska et al
| La Toya M Cruz and La Toya M. Cruz |
| Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services, State of Nebraska and The State of Nebraska, Acting Through the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services |
| 4:2019cv03042 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Certificate of Service - Rule 26(a) by Attorney James D. Hamilton on behalf of Plaintiff La Toya M. Cruz.(Hamilton, James) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Service by Attorney Stephanie A. Caldwell on behalf of Defendants State of Nebraska, The State of Nebraska, Acting Through the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.(Caldwell, Stephanie) |
| Filing 9 TEXT MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held by telephone on June 18, 2019, before Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. Discussion held regarding notice of removal and state court proceedings. The Rule 26(f) Meeting Report Deadline is extended to July 15, 2019. (SMN) |
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER granting 7 Email Motion. A Telephone Conference is set for 6/18/2019 at 11:00 AM CDT before Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. The parties shall call in using the case conference instructions associated with this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (JLM)
|
| Filing 7 TEXT EMAIL MOTION - by counsel for the counsel for the parties. The parties request a telephone conference with the Court to discuss the removal status of the case. (JLM) |
|
Filing 6
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 6/20/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
|
| Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 by State of Nebraska, The State of Nebraska, Acting Through the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (Caldwell, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney James D. Hamilton has not paid the biennial assessment. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LKO) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against La Toya M Cruz from District Court of Lancaster County, Case number CI 18-3651 with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Stephanie A. Caldwell on behalf of Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services, State of Nebraska (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Caldwell, Stephanie) |
| FILING FEE PAID on behalf of Defendant State of Nebraska. Receipt number 4007578, in the amount of $400.00. (LKO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
