Gray v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
| Graylin Gray |
| Harbans Deol, Scott R. Frakes, Does 1-20 and Nebraska Department of Correctional Services |
| 4:2019cv03063 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (filing no. #11 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Amend or Alter Judgment - Pro Se #10 on behalf of Plaintiff Graylin Gray. (LKO) |
|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - This case is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the corresponding Memorandum and Order entered on this date. Any notice of appeal filed by Plaintiff Graylin Gray must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Plaintiff will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. #2 ) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Filing No. #4 ) is denied as moot. This case is dismissed without prejudice and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Any notice of appeal filed by Plaintiff must be accompanied by the $505.00 appellate filing fee because Plaintiff will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE regarding Memorandum and Order (Show Cause) #7 on behalf of Plaintiff Graylin Gray. (LKO) |
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff has 30 days to either show cause for why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) or pay the courts $400.00 filing and administrative fees. The clerk;s office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: July 24, 2019: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause or pay fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB) |
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Plaintiff Graylin Gray. (ADB) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Plaintiff Graylin Gray. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (ADB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Graylin Gray. (ADB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Harbans Deol, Does 1-20, Scott R. Frakes, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services; no Summons(es) issued ; filed on behalf of Graylin Gray. (ADB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
