Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
| Bill Lietzke |
| Patrick D. Smith and City of Birmingham |
| 4:2019cv03091 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 LETTER on behalf of Plaintiff Bill Lietzke. (LKO) |
Filing 10
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - This case is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons discussed in the Memorandum and Order entered on this date. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This case is dismissed without prejudice to reassertion in the proper forum. Judgment will be entered by separate document. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. #2 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT STRIKE ORDER that Pursuant to NEGenR 1.3(a)(4), the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #7 is stricken for the following reason: document filed in incorrect case. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (LKO) |
| Filing 6 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 15 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1.(TCL) |
| Filing 7 *STRICKEN* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Bill Lietzke. (LKO) Modified on 9/12/2019 to strike (LKO). |
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2016-02: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Senior Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (TCL) |
| Filing 3 Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories on behalf of Plaintiff Bill Lietzke. (TCL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Bill Lietzke. (TCL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Birmingham, Patrick D. Smith. No Summons issued filed on behalf Bill Lietzke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(TCL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
