Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Plaintiff: Allan Sanders
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Case Number: 4:2020cv03023
Filed: February 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Susan M Bazis
2 Judge: John M Gerrard
3 Judge: Michael D Nelson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral testimony only under Rule 45, is January 29, 2021. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A telephonic status conference to discuss case progression, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on February 2, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. (Filing No. #15 .) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
April 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 TEXT MINUTE ENTRY for planning conference proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis on 4/16/2020. The parties discussed noticing of depositions. The Court ordered that the Plaintiff cannot unilaterally notice up a deposition, the parties must meet and confer regarding the scheduling of depositions. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW)
April 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 TEXT ORDER: As requested by the parties in their Rule 26(f) Report, a Planning Conference will be held on 4/16/2020 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. Case conference instructions are found at Filing No. 15. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (RMW)
April 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 PROTECTIVE ORDER - Upon consideration of the parties' joint request for entry of a Protective Order, (Filing No. #14 ), the Court enters the following Protective Order governing the disclosure of confidential Discovery Material by a Producing Party to a Receiving Party in this Action. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
April 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 AMENDED CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
April 8, 2020 Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co..(Moore, Scott)
March 26, 2020 Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation, Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation for Union Pacific Railroad Co.. by Attorney Scott P. Moore on behalf of Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Co., Union Pacific Corporation, Union Pacific Corporation.(Moore, Scott)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER - Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 4/15/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
March 13, 2020 Filing 10 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS)
March 12, 2020 Filing 9 DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYS ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT ANSWER to Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Co. (Moore, Scott)
February 27, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Union Pacific Railroad Company defendant Allan Sanders on 2/24/2020. (Stull, Corey)
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - that this case is reassigned to Senior District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon for disposition and to Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (LKO)
February 25, 2020 Filing 6 TEXT ORDER regarding Pro Hac Vice admission fee in the amount of $100.00 is refunded to the payor, Corey L. Stull, receipt number ANEDC-4117579. Filing #5 was filed in error. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JLS)
February 21, 2020 Filing 5 STRICKEN MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ANEDC-4117579 by Attorney Corey L. Stull on behalf of Plaintiff Allan Sanders.(Stull, Corey) Modified on 2/26/2020 to reflect stricken pursuant to filing 6 . (JLS)
February 21, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM)
February 21, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Defendant regarding Assignment of Judges, 2 , Complaint #1 . (Stull, Corey)
February 20, 2020 Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM)
February 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand Allan Sanders against Union Pacific Railroad Co. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4117093), by Attorney Corey L. Stull on behalf of Allan sanders(Stull, Corey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allan Sanders
Represented By: Corey L. Stull
Represented By: Nicholas D. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Represented By: Susan K. Tvrdy
Represented By: Scott P. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?