Gubbels et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
Kevin Gubbels and Insure My Honey, Inc. |
Sonny Perdue, United States Risk Management Agency, Martin R. Barbre and United States Department of Agriculture |
4:2020cv03060 |
June 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
John M Gerrard |
Michael D Nelson |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. § 551 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 TEXT ORDER granting #24 Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (DCD) |
Filing 25 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding UNOPPOSED MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act to Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment #24 , MOTION to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment #16 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendants Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Risk Management Agency.(Hook, Timothy) |
Filing 24 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act to Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendants Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Risk Management Agency.(Hook, Timothy) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE regarding MOTION to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment #16 and Reply Brief in Support of Mtn for Preliminary Injunction by Attorney Harriet Hageman on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Gubbels, Insure My Honey, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit)(Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 22 TEXT ORDER granting #21 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Insure My Honey, Inc., Kevin Gubbels. The plaintiffs may respond to the defendants' motion to dismiss #16 and reply in support of their motion for preliminary injunction #6 on or before July 17, 2020. The defendants may reply in support of their motion to dismiss #16 on or before July 24, 2020. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (DCD) |
Filing 21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Harriet Hageman on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Gubbels, Insure My Honey, Inc..(Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 20 TEXT ORDER granting #17 Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (DCD) |
Filing 19 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Defendants' Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and in opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction regarding MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act #17 , MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendants #6 , MOTION to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment #16 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendants Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Risk Management Agency.(Hook, Timothy) |
Filing 18 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT Index of Evidentiary Materials in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Partial Motion for Summary Judgment and in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction regarding MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act #17 , MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendants #6 , MOTION to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment #16 ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). - by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendants Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Risk Management Agency. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Heather Manzano with Attachments A-N)(Hook, Timothy) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendants Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Risk Management Agency.(Hook, Timothy) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendants Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Risk Management Agency.(Hook, Timothy) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Sonny Perdue on 6/5/2020. (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant United States Risk Management Agency on 6/8/2020. (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant United States Department of Agriculture on 6/8/2020. (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Martin R. Barbre on 6/8/2020. (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to defendants Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, and United States Risk Management Agency. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Caleb Kruckenberg has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LRM) |
Filing 9 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Harriet Hageman on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Gubbels, Insure My Honey, Inc..(Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 7 BRIEF in support of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendants #6 by Attorney Harriet Hageman on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Gubbels, Insure My Honey, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendants by Attorney Harriet Hageman on behalf of Plaintiffs Kevin Gubbels, Insure My Honey, Inc..(Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 5 Summons Requested as to United States Department of Agriculture regarding Complaint, #1 . (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested as to United States Risk Management Agency regarding Complaint, #1 . (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Sonny Perdue regarding Complaint, #1 . (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint, #1 . (Hageman, Harriet) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin R. Barbre, Sonny Perdue, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Risk Management Agency ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-4168999), by Attorney Harriet Hageman on behalf of Kevin Gubbels, Insure My Honey, Inc.(Hageman, Harriet) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.