Johansson et al v. Nelnet, Inc. et al
| Andrew Johansson, Anetra Faison, Jon Pearce, Heather Porter and Linda Stanley |
| Nelnet Diversified Solutions, LLC, Nelnet Servicing, LLC and Nelnet, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv03069 |
| June 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
ORDER - The deadline for completing fact discovery is February 15, 2023. A telephonic conference will be held on February 22, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the trial and pretrial setting. The parties shall use the conferencing information assigned to this case to participate in the hearing. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER - The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (filing 166 ) are adopted. The plaintiffs' objection (filing 167 ) is overruled. The defendants' Motion to Strike the plaintiffs' class action allegations and Motion for Class Certification (filing 150 ) is granted. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the Plaintiffs' 109 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 90 Findings and Recommendation. Plaintiff Heather Porter's claims are dismissed without prejudice. Porter is terminated as a party. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER, after conferring with counsel. The plaintiff's 72 Motion to Extend is granted in part as set forth within the order. Telephone Conference set for 2/22/2022 at 11:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER - All unexpired case progression deadlines as of December 27, 2021 are stayed pending further order of the court. A telephone conference is set for January 25, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. before the undersigned magistrate judge to discuss case pro gression and the pending motion to extend discovery. The parties shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the call. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to: Heather Porter, 4173 Humphrey, St. Louis, MO 63116-3824. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed)(LKO)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER - Plaintiff's counsel has notified the court of an updated address for Heather Porter provided by the U.S. Post Office. Accordingly, the clerk shall: Mail a copy of the court's order, (Filing No. 75 ), to Heather Porter, 4173 Humphrey, Saint Louis, MO 63116-3824. Update the court's docket to reflect Heather Porter's address is now 4173 Humphrey, Saint Louis, MO 63116-3824. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting the 74 Motion to Withdraw filed by David Domina, Anthony Fiorentino, and the attorneys of Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin, LLC, as counsel of record for Plaintiff Heather Porter. On or before January 19, 2022, Plaintiff Heathe r Porter shall either: (a) obtain the services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance in this case; or (b) file a statement notifying the court of her intent to litigate this case without the assistance of counsel. The failure to timely do so may result in dismissal of Heather Porter's claims without further notice. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Heather Porter at 3954 N. Enright Ave, St. Louis, MO 63108. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copies mailed as directed to Heather Porter)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting the Plaintiff's 66 Motion to Continue. The parties' 69 Stipulation for additional time is approved as set forth within the order. Deposition deadline April 18, 2022. The conference with the court, currently scheduled for March 22, 2022, is continued, and it will be held on April 26, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 64 Motion for Protective Order Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motion to dismiss (filing 21 ) is granted in part and in part denied. Plaintiff Anetra Faison's claims are dismissed without prejudice. The remaining plaintiffs' claim for an accounting a t law is dismissed. Plaintiff Linda Stanley's prayer for relief on behalf of the class for an award of attorneys' fees and punitive damages is stricken. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for case progression. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER that Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Exceed NECivR 7.1(d) World Limit is granted. (Filing No. 19 ). To avoid any delays in this case, If the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the undersigned magistrate judge, on or bef ore September 14, 2020, they shall complete the "CONSENT TO RANDOM ASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE" located on the court's website at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. After all parties have signed this form, e-mail it in.pdf forma t to clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. Do not electronically file this form or submit it to chambers. In the absence of timely submitting the fully executed consent form in accordance with paragraph (1) of this order, the case will be reassigned to a district judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
