Mohammed v. Renaud
| Zeeshanuddin Ghori Mohammed |
| Tracy Renaud |
| 4:2021cv03129 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark - Public: This case has been dismissed pursuant to the filing of a Notice of Case Dismissal. (CS) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by Attorney Geoffrey Forney on behalf of Plaintiff Zeeshanuddin Ghori Mohammed (Forney, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Tracy Renaud on 7/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Service on the Attorney General, #2 Service on U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services)(Forney, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 6 Certificate regarding MOTION for Preliminary Injunction #2 - Certificate of Service by Attorney Geoffrey Forney on behalf of Plaintiff Zeeshanuddin Ghori Mohammed.(Forney, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Tracy Renaud, United States Attorney's Office, and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LRM) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Tracy Renaud regarding Complaint, #1 . (Forney, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Attorney Geoffrey Forney on behalf of Plaintiff Zeeshanuddin Ghori Mohammed. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support, #2 Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(Forney, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tracy Renaud ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4429138), by Attorney Geoffrey Forney on behalf of Zeeshanuddin Ghori Mohammed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Forney, Geoffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mohammed v. Renaud | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tracy Renaud | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zeeshanuddin Ghori Mohammed | |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey Forney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
