Brown v. Stino et al
| Mary Ann Brown |
| Joshua Stino, Bio-Pharm Manufactured, Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories, Torrent Pharma and MedWatch Voluntary Report |
| 4:2021cv03140 |
| July 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER that Joshua Stine and The Harvard Drug Group, L.L.C.'s Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. #21 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion at a later time. Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown's informal request for a hearing is denied. Brown is granted leave to file an amended complaint on or before November 12, 2021. Brown shall then have ninety days to perfect service on any named defendants in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Failing to comply with this order could result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
| Filing 27 SUPPLEMENT regarding Response #25 on behalf of Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown. (LKO) |
| Filing 26 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Cardinal Health, Inc., Corporate Parent Cardinal Health, Inc., Corporate Parent Harvard Drug Group, LLC, Corporate Parent Harvard Drug Group, LLC, Corporate Parent Generic Drug Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Generic Drug Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent HDG Acquisition, Inc., Corporate Parent HDG Acquisition, Inc., Corporate Parent Cardinal Health 110, LLC, Corporate Parent Cardinal Health 110, LLC for Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories. by Attorney Adam J. Prochaska on behalf of Defendants Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories, Harvard Drug Group, LLC, Harvard Drug Group, LLC, Generic Drug Holdings, Inc., Generic Drug Holdings, Inc., HDG Acquisition, Inc., HDG Acquisition, Inc., Cardinal Health 110, LLC, Cardinal Health 110, LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc..(Prochaska, Adam) |
| Filing 24 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(CS) |
| Filing 25 RESPONSE regarding MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #21 on behalf of Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown. (LKO) |
| Filing 23 INDEX in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #21 by Attorney Adam J. Prochaska on behalf of Defendants Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories, Joshua Stino. (Attachments: #1 SEC filing by Torrent Pharma, #2 Torrent Pharma website, #3 FDA web page)(Prochaska, Adam) |
| Filing 22 BRIEF in support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM #21 by Attorney Adam J. Prochaska on behalf of Defendants Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories, Joshua Stino.(Prochaska, Adam) |
| Filing 21 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Attorney Adam J. Prochaska on behalf of Defendants Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories, Joshua Stino.(Prochaska, Adam) |
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant MedWatch Voluntary Report on 8/3/2021. (LAC) |
| Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Torrent Pharma on 8/3/2021. (LAC) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories on 8/3/2021. (LAC) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Bio-Pharm Manufactured on 8/3/2021. (LAC) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Joshua Stino on 8/3/2021. (LAC) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued (COPY) as to All Defendants regarding Complaint - Pro Se #1 . Originals given to pro se plaintiff for completion of service. (SLP) Modified on 8/2/2021 to correct text (SLP). |
| Filing 14 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to defendant Joshua Stino. (SLP) |
| Filing 13 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to defendant Bio-Pharm Manufactured. (SLP) |
| Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to defendant Torrent Pharma. (SLP) |
| Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to defendant MedWatch Voluntary Report. (SLP) |
| Filing 10 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to defendant Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories. (SLP) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to update defendant on behalf of Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown. (SLP) |
| Filing 8 RESTRICTED NOTICE on behalf of Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (MLF) |
|
Filing 7
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - - Pursuant to the supervising pro se judge's order of July 26, 2021 (Filing No. #6 ), this case is reassigned to Chief District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. for disposition and Magistrate Susan M. Bazis for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (filing #2 ) is denied as moot. The filing fee has been paid in this case. At the direction of the court, this case is removed from the pro se docket. The clerks office shall assign new judges to this case and request a reassignment order from Chief Judge Rossiter. Chief Judge Rossiter is hereby notified that the above-captioned case appears to be related to Brown v. Sidhu et al., No. 8:20-cv-00342-RFR-SMB (D. Neb.), within the meaning of NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C). The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Chief Judge Rossiter. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued (COPY) as to defendants Bio-Pharm Manufactured, Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories, MedWatch Voluntary Report, Joshua Stino, and Torrent Pharma. Originals given to pro se plaintiff for completion of service. (LKO) |
| FILING FEE PAID on behalf of Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown. Receipt number 4008012, in the amount of $ 402.00. (LKO) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy Mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown. (LAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bio-Pharm Manufactured, Major Pharmaceuticals and Rugby Laboratories, MedWatch Voluntary Report, Joshua Stino, and Torrent Pharma filed on behalf of pro se Plaintiff Mary Ann Brown. (LAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
