Pullens v. Schatz
Stephen Pullens |
Judge Gregory Schatz |
4:2021cv03189 |
September 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G Kopf |
Prisoner: Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION providing Supplemental Information for the Petition for Writ of Mandamus on behalf of Petitioner Stephen Pullens.(MKR) |
Filing 10 LETTER filed on behalf of Petitioner Stephen Pullens.(MKR) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing #6 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct an initial review of the mandamus petition to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 1915A. The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business and will address Petitioner's pending motion for appointment of counsel at that time. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR) |
Filing 8 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (MKR) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel on behalf of Petitioner Stephen Pullens. (MKR) |
Filing 6 MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Stephen Pullens.(MKR) |
Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Mandamus on behalf of Petitioner Stephen Pullens. (MKR) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the clerks office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 10/27/2021Check for MIFP or payment) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copies mailed as directed with AO240 form)(MKR) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR) |
Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The petitioner shall correct the deficiency within 15 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1. (MKR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus on behalf of Petitioner Stephen Pullens.(MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pullens v. Schatz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Stephen Pullens | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Judge Gregory Schatz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.