Fagan v. Kelly et al
| Bobbi Lynn Fagan |
| Sean Kelly, Ryan G. Normon, Michael Olkerbak and Kabredlo's Inc. |
| 4:2021cv03326 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
JUDGMENT - PRO SE - Pursuant to the court's Memorandum and Order filed this date, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED providing that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Notice - Civil Appeals in Pro Se Cases) Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to Bobbi Lynn Fagan regarding Memorandum and Order #9 . Mail not resent, vacant and unable to forward. (LAC) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to Bobbi Lynn Fagan regarding Memorandum and Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 . Mail not resent, vacant and unable to forward. (LAC) |
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff must update her address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: February 2, 2022: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to Bobbi Lynn Fagan regarding Notice by Clerk (Pro Se Case) #5 and Order - Pro Se GO 2020-01, #6 . Mail not resent, vacant and unable to forward. (LAC) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in her case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of her claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
|
|
Filing 6
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Substitute Custodian on behalf of Plaintiff Bobbi Lynn Fagan.(LAC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Summons on behalf of Plaintiff Bobbi Lynn Fagan.(LAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Bobbi Lynn Fagan.(LAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kabredlo's Inc., Sean Kelly, Ryan G. Normon, and Michael Olkerbak filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Bobbi Lynn Fagan. (LAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
