Libault v. Mamo et al
| Marc Libault |
| Martha Mamo, Ravneet Kaur, Asha Mane and Institute of Agriculture and Natural Ressources at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln |
| 4:2022cv03096 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G Kopf |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
REASSIGNMENT ORDER - Pursuant to the supervising pro se judge's order of June 29, 2022 (Filing No. 7), this case is reassigned to District Judge Brian C. Buescher for disposition and Magistrate Michael D. Nelson for judicial supervision. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER - The filing fee has been paid in this case. At the direction of the Court, this case is removed from the pro se docket. The clerks office shall randomly assign new judges to this case and request a reassignment order from the Chief Judge. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| FILING FEE PAID on behalf of Plaintiff Marc Libault. Receipt number 4008157, in the amount of $ 402.00. (LKO) |
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (filing 5) is denied. Plaintiff shall pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in this matter being dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: July 25, 2022: deadline for Plaintiff to pay $402.00 filing fee. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Marc Libault.(TCL) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: June 24, 2022: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with AO240 Form)(TCL)
|
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2020-01: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (TCL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Institute of Agriculture and Natural Ressources at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Ravneet Kaur, Martha Mamo, Asha Mane. No Summons issued, filed on behalf of pro se plaintiff Marc Libault. (TCL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
