Webb v. Franken et al
| Yohan Webb |
| Matthew Franken and Capitol Towing |
| 4:2022cv03146 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Joseph F Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address on behalf of Plaintiff Yohan Webb. (LRM) |
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff must update his address in each of the above-captioned cases within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of these actions without further notice to Plaintiff. Plaintiff must also either file a new request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the Courts $402.00 filing and administrative fees in each of the above-captioned cases within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of these actions without further notice to Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff two copies of the Form AO 240, "Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit." The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in each of the above-captioned cases using the following text: September 28, 2022: deadline to update address and file new IFP motion or pay filing fee. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party with Two AO240 Forms)(TCL)
|
| Filing 8 LETTER from Lancaster County Corrections that Plaintiff Yohan Webb has been released from custody on 8/19/2022. (TCL) |
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee shall be collected and remitted, as funds exist, in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. The next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party and to the financial officer at institution as directed)(ADB)
|
| Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Yohan Webb. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (TCL) |
| Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. Letter sent to Elisha Havick at Lancaster County Jail. (TCL) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (TCL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Yohan Webb.(TCL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Capitol Towing, Matthew Franken No Summons issued, filed on behalf of plaintiff Yohan Webb.(TCL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
