Poonawala et al v. Jaddou
Plaintiff: Fatema Shabbir Poonawala, Daniyal Samar Satpalkar and Samar Prafulla Satpalkar
Defendant: Ur Jaddou
Case Number: 4:2022cv03159
Filed: August 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: John M Gerrard
Referring Judge: Cheryl R Zwart
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #6 the parties' stipulation to extend Defendant's deadline to file an answer or responsive pleading to November 14, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
September 30, 2022 Filing 6 JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading and Stipulation of the Parties by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendant Ur Jaddou.(Hook, Timothy)
August 30, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon U.S Attorney's Office for defendant Ur Jaddou on 8/8/2022. (Bless, Jesse)
August 4, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Ur Jaddou, United States Attorney's Office, and U.S. Attorney General. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES)
August 4, 2022 Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES)
August 4, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Requested as to regarding Complaint #1 . (Bless, Jesse)
August 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4685727), by Attorney Jesse M. Bless on behalf of Fatema Shabbir Poonawala, Daniyal Samar Satpalkar, Samar Prafulla Satpalkar(Bless, Jesse)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Poonawala et al v. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fatema Shabbir Poonawala
Represented By: Jesse M. Bless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniyal Samar Satpalkar
Represented By: Jesse M. Bless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samar Prafulla Satpalkar
Represented By: Jesse M. Bless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Jaddou
Represented By: Timothy R. Hook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?