Torma v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Krisztian G. Torma
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Case Number: 4:2022cv03167
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Referring Judge: Cheryl R Zwart
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Dismiss. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
September 13, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss 41(a) Voluntary Dismissal by Attorney Christopher M. Casazza on behalf of Plaintiff Krisztian G. Torma. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Casazza, Christopher)
August 26, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant All Defendants. (Casazza, Christopher)
August 17, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, and United States Attorney's Office. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES)
August 17, 2022 Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES)
August 16, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou regarding Complaint, #1 . (Casazza, Christopher)
August 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4692187), by Attorney Christopher M. Casazza on behalf of Krisztian G. Torma (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A-F)(Casazza, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torma v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krisztian G. Torma
Represented By: Christopher M. Casazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?