Puok v. Douglas District Court
Maker Puok |
Douglas District Court |
Nebraska Attorney General |
4:2022cv03201 |
September 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 LETTER on behalf of Petitioner Maker Puok. (JES) |
Filing 7 PRISONER ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Maker Puok. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (LRM) |
Filing 6 LETTER by Clerk requesting plaintiff's trust account statement from institution. (LRM) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Maker Puok. (LKO) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY by Deputy Clerk that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 has been filed and is considered deficient because the document is not signed. The plaintiff shall correct the deficiency within 15 days of the date of this entry or the pleading may be stricken from the record of this case. See NECivR 11.1.(LRM) |
|
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of petitioner Maker Puok. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.