Jamerson v. Sabatka-Rine
Robert C. Jamerson |
Nebraska Dept. of Corrections, Scott Franks, United States District Courts of Appeal for the District of Nebraska and Diana Sabatka-Rine |
Nebraska Attorney General |
4:2022cv03220 |
October 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Telephonically filed by Petitioner Robert C. Jamerson. (JAB) |
Filing 9 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Defendant Diana Sabatka-Rine filed on behalf of Petitioner Robert C. Jamerson. (MKR) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -The pending Petition, Filing No. #1 , is deemed insufficient and the Court will not act upon it. By November 18, 2022, Petitioner shall file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus that is originally signed under penalty of perjury and in which he names the proper respondent. Petitioner is encouraged to use the enclosed official Form AO 241. To avoid confusion, any document Petitioner sends to the Clerk of the Court for filing in this case must clearly display the case number (4:22CV3220). Failure to file an amended petition in accordance with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO 241 ("Petition for Relief From a Conviction or Sentence By a Person in State Custody"). ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 11/18/2022: check for amended petition) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party with AO241 form)(MKR) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Petitioner's #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The next step in this case is for the Court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The Court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR) |
Filing 6 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT / CERTIFICATE by Petitioner Robert C. Jamerson. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (SLP) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT regarding MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #4 on behalf of Petitioner Robert C. Jamerson. (SLP) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Petitioner Robert C. Jamerson. (SLP) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 fee to the Clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 11/7/2022: Check for MIFP or payment.) Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (MKR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of Petitioner Robert C. Jamerson.(MKR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.