Randolph v. SERC, LLC et al
| Sharon Randolph, SERC, LLC and Donald Dreesen |
| 4:2022cv03247 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Real Property: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER Consent Deadline set for 2/17/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LRM)
|
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER SETTING HEARING: A telephone conference to discuss case progression is set for January 6, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. before the undersigned magistrate judge. The parties shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the call. (Filing No. 9). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CEW)
|
| Filing 11 LETTER Requesting for Planning Conference by Attorney Kristina J. Kamler on behalf of Plaintiff Sharon Randolph.(Kamler, Kristina) |
| Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Attorney Kristina J. Kamler on behalf of Plaintiff Sharon Randolph.(Kamler, Kristina) |
|
Filing 9
RESTRICTED CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LRM)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 1/4/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LRM)
|
| Filing 7 Plaintiff's REPLY to Counterclaim by Sharon Randolph (Kamler, Kristina) |
| Filing 6 DEFENDANT DONALD DREESEN'S ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Donald Dreesen (Greene, Earl) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Notice of Removal Complaint regarding: Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 , COUNTERCLAIM against Sharon Randolph regarding Notice of Removal Attorney - Complaint, #1 filed by SERC, LLC by SERC, LLC (Amare, Lily) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Lily Amare on behalf of Defendant SERC, LLC.(Amare, Lily) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant SERC, LLC. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(JES) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against sharon randolph from District Court of Platte County, NE, Case number CI 22-367 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4751131) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Lily Amare on behalf of SERC, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Amare, Lily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
