Korde et al v. Blinken et al
| Ankita Arun Korde and Krishneshwar Kamineni |
| Antony J. Blinken and Ur Jaddou |
| 4:2023cv03006 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Antony J. Blinken, Ur Jaddou (1- U.S. Attorney, 1- U.S. Attorney General). YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (TCL) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (TCL) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Antony J. Blinken and Ur Jaddou regarding Complaint #1 . (Bless, Jesse) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony J. Blinken, Ur Jaddou ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4789524), by Attorney Jesse M. Bless on behalf of Ankita Arun Korde, Krishneshwar Kamineni(Bless, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
