Hillebrandt et al v. Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. et al
Charles Hillebrandt, Jessica Hillebrandt, Nolan Hillebrandt, Charlene Stehlik and Frederick Stehlik |
Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. and Yorkwind Crawford |
4:2023cv03067 |
April 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Cheryl R Zwart |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Matthew R. Chouinard on behalf of Defendants Yorkwind Crawford, Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. (Chouinard, Matthew) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney Daniel F. Church on behalf of Defendants Yorkwind Crawford, Critical Supply Solutions, Inc..(Church, Daniel) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Brittain E. McClurg on behalf of Defendants Yorkwind Crawford, Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. (McClurg, Brittain) |
![]() |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Carrie K. Gaines on behalf of Defendant Critical Supply Solutions, Inc..(Gaines, Carrie) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. (Church, Daniel) |
Filing 5 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Yorkwind Crawford. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(TCL) |
Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires.(TCL) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (TCL) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION by Attorney Daniel F. Church on behalf of Defendants Yorkwind Crawford, Critical Supply Solutions, Inc..(Church, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4848035) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Daniel F. Church on behalf of Critical Supply Solutions, Inc., Yorkwind Crawford (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Church, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.