Grajales Cortes et al v. Miller et al
| Maria del Carmen Grajales Cortes, Diana Marcela Guingui Grajales and Diana Marcela Guingue Grajales |
| Loren K Miller, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Antony J. Blinken, Phillip Slattery and Richard C. Visek |
| 4:2023cv03073 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion to Exceed Briefing Word Limits. Defendants may file one brief, with a word allowance of up to 26,000 words for their opening brief, and 13,000 words for their reply brief, for their dispositive motion briefing. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH)
|
| Filing 13 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to Exceed Briefing Word Limits by Attorney Timothy R. Hook on behalf of Defendants Antony J. Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K Miller, Phillip Slattery, Richard C. Visek.(Hook, Timothy) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to defendants Antony J. Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K Miller, Phillip Slattery, Richard C. Visek regarding Complaint, #1 . YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (NMW) |
| Filing 11 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (NMW) |
| Filing 10 Summons Requested as to Richard C. Visek regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 9 Summons Requested as to Phillip Slattery regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 8 Summons Requested as to Loren K. Miller regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 7 Summons Requested as to Alejandro Mayorkas regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 6 Summons Requested as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 5 Summons Requested as to Merrick Garland regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested as to Civil Process Clerk regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Antony Blinken regarding Complaint, #1 . (Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and GMAC Commercial Credit LLC v. Dillard Department Stores, 357 F.3d 827, 828 (8th Cir. 2004) by Attorney Hector E. Quiroga on behalf of Plaintiffs Diana Marcela Guingui Grajales, Maria del Carmen Grajales Cortes.(Quiroga, Hector) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus against Antony J. Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K Miller, Phillip Slattery, Richard C. Visek ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4851634), by Attorney Hector E. Quiroga on behalf of Diana Marcela Guingui Grajales, Maria del Carmen Grajales Cortes (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibits)(Quiroga, Hector) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
