Sheffield et al v. Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. et al
| Matthew Sheffield and Sawyer Sheffield |
| Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. and Yorkwind Crawford |
| 4:2023cv03115 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| John M Gerrard |
| Robert F Rossiter |
| Cheryl R Zwart |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - Depositions due 8/9/2024. The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. Status Conference set for 8/20/2024 at 09:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JES)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: After a conference with the parties, the court ordered the cases consolidated for the purposes of discovery. At this time, new case progression deadlines are necessary. IT IS ORDERED: Counsel for the parties shall confer and, on or before August 21, 2023, they shall jointly submit to chambers (zwart@ned.uscourts.gov) proposed case progression deadlines. On or before August 18, 2023, a party shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference call if the parties cannot agree on one or more of the deadlines and a planning conference is necessary. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER - The above-captioned cases are consolidated for the purposes of discovery. All unexpired case progression deadlines are stayed pending further order of the court. On or before July 26, 2023, the parties shall jointly advise the court (by email to the undersigned magistrate judge copied to all parties or by a jointly filed statement) as to whether they want the court to review the plaintiffs' respective damage claims with the goal of confirming that the available insurance coverage is inadequate and estimating each plaintiff's percent of the total damages collectively incurred by all plaintiffs. The clerk shall set an internal case management deadline of July 26, 2023 to check on compliance with this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JES)
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 identifying Corporate Parent Critical Supply Solutions, Inc., Corporate Parent Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. for Critical Supply Solutions, Inc.. by Attorney Brittain E. McClurg on behalf of Defendants Critical Supply Solutions, Inc., Critical Supply Solutions, Inc., Critical Supply Solutions, Inc..(McClurg, Brittain) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING HEARING: A telephone conference in the above-captioned cases is set before the undersigned magistrate judge on July 12, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. to discuss the parties' interest in settlement. The parties shall use the conferencing information emailed to counsel to participate in the hearing. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LRM)
|
|
Filing 7
CASE CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(e). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (NMW)
|
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 7/26/2023.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (NMW)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with with jury demand by Yorkwind Crawford, Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. (Church, Daniel) |
|
Filing 4
REASSIGNMENT ORDER These cases are related to case number 8:22CV143. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(C)(iii). Accordingly, pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B), these cases are reassigned to Chief District Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. for disposition and are assigned to Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.. (LRM)
|
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE REGARDING CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Deputy Clerk as to Defendant Critical Supply Solutions, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, non-governmental corporate parties are required to file Corporate Disclosure Statements (Statements). The parties shall use the form Corporate Disclosure Statement, available on the Web site of the court at http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/forms/. If you have not filed your Statement, you must do so within 15 days of the date of this notice. If you have already filed your Statement in this case, you are reminded to file a Supplemental Statement within a reasonable time of any change in the information that the statement requires. (JES) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against Matthew Sheffield, Sawyer Sheffield from District Court of Lancaster County, NE, Case number CI230000621 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4888946) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Daniel F. Church on behalf of Critical Supply Solutions, Inc., Yorkwind Crawford (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Church, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
