Arentsen v. State of Nebraska et al
Nathan James Arentsen |
State of Nebraska, Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services, Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, University of Nebraska, University of Nebraska - Lincoln and Paradigm, Inc. |
4:2023cv03131 |
July 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM) |
Remark - Public: CM/ECF NextGen e-filing request from pro se plaintiff Nathan James Arentsen received. Access granted on 7/26/23. (JLS) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of Plaintiff Nathan James Arentsen.(NMW) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff is directed to submit the $402.00 fees to the Clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 ("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: August 21, 2023: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM) |
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-04: This general order provides for the management and assignment of cases filed by a plaintiff or petitioner without counsel. This general order also includes the definition of the pro se docket, responsibilities of the pro se law clerks and scheduling and discovery requirements in pro se cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Clerk acknowledging receipt of complaint filed by a pro se party. (LRM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services, Paradigm, Inc., State of Nebraska, University of Nebraska, University of Nebraska - Lincoln filed on behalf of Nathan James Arentsen. (LRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.