Hamlin v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Jessica R. Hamlin
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2024cv03031
Filed: February 6, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Bataillon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER It is ordered that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Filing No. #2 , is granted. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (LRM)
March 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER It is Ordered that the joint motion for reassignment, Filing No. #6 , is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (LRM)
February 28, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance and Withdrawal of Counsel by Attorney Lynnett M. Wagner on behalf of Defendant Martin O'Malley (Wagner, Lynnett)
February 27, 2024 Filing 6 JOINT MOTION to Reassign Case to Consent to Exercise Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge by Attorney Kelsey J. Young on behalf of Plaintiff Jessica R. Hamlin.(Young, Kelsey)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER NO. 2022-13: In the Matter of Procedures for Social Security Cases. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JES)
February 6, 2024 Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES)
February 6, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Kelsey J. Young on behalf of Plaintiff Jessica R. Hamlin (Young, Kelsey)
February 6, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Attorney Kelsey J. Young on behalf of Plaintiff Jessica R. Hamlin.(Young, Kelsey)
February 6, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley, by Attorney Kelsey J. Young on behalf of Jessica R. Hamlin (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Kelsey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamlin v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica R. Hamlin
Represented By: Kelsey J. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Represented By: Lynnett M. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Represented By: Office of General Counsel Social Security Administ
Represented By: Timothy R. Hook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?