Trail v. Jeffreys
Aubrey C. Trail |
Rob Jeffreys |
Nebraska Attorney General |
4:2024cv03032 |
February 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
Joseph F Bataillon |
Jacqueline M DeLuca |
Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Stacy M. Foust on behalf of Respondent Rob Jeffreys (Foust, Stacy) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the habeas corpus petition, Filing No. #1 , the Court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claims, as they are set forth in this Memorandum and Order, are potentially cognizable in federal Court. By April 22, 2024, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state Court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 22, 2024: deadline for Respondent to file state Court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file a motion for summary judgment, the procedures set forth within the order must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the procedures set forth within the order must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: May 22, 2024: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 4/22/2024: deadline for Respondent to file state Court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca. (MKR) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting the Petitioner's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Filing No. 2, is granted. The next step in this case is for the Court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The Court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing IFP Affidavit in Support of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Attorney Laurence E. Komp on behalf of Petitioner Aubrey C. Trail (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Signed IFP Affidavit)(Komp, Laurence) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Mandi Schenley has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (JES) |
Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Attorney Laurence E. Komp on behalf of Petitioner Aubrey Clifton Trail.(Komp, Laurence) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , by Attorney Laurence E. Komp on behalf of Aubrey Clifton Trail(Komp, Laurence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.