Mandujano et al v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc. et al
| Tomas Rojas, Diana Mandujano and Ricardo Velasquez |
| Melton Truck Lines, Inc. and John Bowen |
| 4:2024cv03167 |
| September 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Jacqueline M DeLuca |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed upon defendant John Bowen. Waiver sent on 9/30/2024. (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed upon defendant Melton Truck Lines, Inc.. Waiver sent on 9/24/2024. (Chaloupka, Maren) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Susan M. Bazis and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5161706), by Attorney Maren L. Chaloupka on behalf of Romi Rojas, Diana Mandujano, Ricardo Velasquez, Tomas Rojas(Chaloupka, Maren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
