Wear v. Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy, LLC
| Kimberly Wear |
| Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy L.L.C. |
| 4:2024cv03186 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Susan M Bazis |
| Ryan C Carson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Thomas L. Stevenson defendant Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy L.L.C. on 11/12/2024. (Sanford, Josh) |
Filing 7
REASSIGNMENT ORDER (TEXT ONLY) - Following Magistrate Judge Ryan C. Carson's swearing in as a United States Magistrate Judge on November 1, 2024, and in the interest of judicial economy, this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ryan C. Carson for judicial supervision and processing of all pretrial matters. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JLS)
|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to Leigh Montgomery at 1105 Milford Street, Houston, TX 77066 regarding Attorney Letter #4 . Mail NOT RE-MAILED: attorney has registered for admittance and for the system. (ADB) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to defendant Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy L.L.C. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Leigh Montgomery has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (JES) |
| Filing 3 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Susan M. Bazis and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 2 Summons Requested as to Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy, LLC c/o Thomas L. Stevenson regarding Complaint #1 . (Sanford, Josh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5181923), by Attorney Josh Sanford on behalf of Kimberly Wear (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Josh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wear v. Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kimberly Wear | |
| Represented By: | Josh Sanford |
| Represented By: | Leigh S. Montgomery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dohman, Akerlund & Eddy L.L.C. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
