Rainbow Popcorn Company v. Intergrain Specialty Products et al
| 7:2006cv05015 |
| June 23, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Contract: Other Office |
| David L. Piester |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER granting 129 Stipulation. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDED, AND DECREED that this matter is hereby DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own respective costs and fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKL)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER denying 121 Motion for Reconsideration. Trial of this matter is set to commence at 1:30 p.m. on May 26, 2009 for a duration of eight trial days in the courtroom, third floor, United States Post Office and Federal Building, 300 East 3rd Stree t North Platte, Nebraska, before the undersigned magistrate judge. The pretrial conference will be held at 12:30 p.m., April 13, 2009 before a magistrate judge in chambers, third floor, United States Post Office and Federal Building, 300 East 3rd Street, North Platte, Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rainbow Popcorn Company v. Intergrain Specialty Products et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
