Diaz v. Colvin
| David Angle Diaz, Jr. |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 7:2016cv05003 |
| August 25, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 7 North Platte Office |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 17 Motion for an Order Reversing the Commissioner's Decision and granting the 19 Motion to Affirm Commissioner's Decision. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (KMG)
|
Filing
16
ORDER - Plaintiff shall file a motion for an order reversing the Commissioner's decision, or granting other relief, together with a supporting brief by: December 15, 2016. Defendant shall file a motion for an order affirming the Commissioner 9;s decision, or granting other relief, together with a supporting brief by: January 17, 2017. Plaintiff may file a reply brief by: January 30, 2017. This case shall be ripe for decision on: January 31, 2017. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (KLF)
|
Filing
5
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall file the original complaint and the accompanying pleadings without the prepayment of costs or fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.