Bowmar et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior et al
Sarah E. Bowmar and Josh T. Bowmar |
United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior, David Bernhardt, John Doe No.3, Department of the Interior, John Doe No.4, John Doe No.5, John Does 1-5, John Doe No.1 and John Doe No. 2 |
7:2019cv05000 |
March 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
John M Gerrard |
Michael D Nelson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior on 4/23/2019. (Preston, G.) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior on 4/15/2019. (Preston, G.) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to defendants United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior and David Bernhardt. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (LKO) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney G. Kline Preston has not paid the biennial assessment. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (LKO) |
Filing 9 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Chief Judge John M. Gerrard and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LKO) |
Filing 8 Summons Requested as to John Doe #5 regarding Summons Requested #2 , Summons Requested #7 , Complaint, #1 , Summons Requested #3 , Summons Requested #6 , Summons Requested #4 , Summons Requested #5 . (Preston, G.) |
Filing 7 Summons Requested as to John Doe #4 regarding Summons Requested #2 , Complaint, #1 , Summons Requested #3 , Summons Requested #6 , Summons Requested #4 , Summons Requested #5 . (Preston, G.) Modified on 3/4/2019 to add John Doe #4 per atty (LKO). |
Filing 6 Summons Requested as to John Doe #3 regarding Summons Requested #2 , Complaint, #1 , Summons Requested #3 , Summons Requested #4 , Summons Requested #5 . (Preston, G.) Modified on 3/4/2019 to add John Doe #3 per atty (LKO). |
Filing 5 Summons Requested as to John Doe #2 regarding Summons Requested #2 , Complaint, #1 , Summons Requested #3 , Summons Requested #4 . (Preston, G.) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested as to John Doe #1 regarding Summons Requested #2 , Complaint, #1 , Summons Requested #3 . (Preston, G.) |
Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Department of the Interior, Acting Secretary David Bernhardt regarding Summons Requested #2 , Complaint, #1 . (Preston, G.) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested as to United States Fish and Wildlife Service regarding Complaint, #1 . (Preston, G.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand Plaintiff against Department of the Interior, John Doe No. 2, John Doe No.1, John Doe No.3, John Doe No.4, John Doe No.5, United states Fish and Wildlife ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANEDC-3881617), by Attorney G. Kline Preston, IV on behalf of Sarah E. Bowmar, Josh T. Bowmar(Preston, G.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.